Quote:
I dunno on that.. I don't use Mozilla.. IE has all the Mozilla plug in built in by default.. and since it was built for web browsing and all web languages and 99.9% of web page formats, IE is the best for me.. everything else is trying to match it in functionality and failing... IE has Netscape plug-ins, Mozilla Plug-ins, Opera uses the IE plug in's but is still not fully functional with the web the way IE is...
Quote:
Plus IE is designed for Windows and is an integral part of Windows, Outlook Express and Windows / MSN messenger
Quote:
... Why mess with something that is not specifically designed for your system and is an integral part of your system???
Quote:
Now those on Linux.. most people I know on linux use Opera or IE.. and of those people over 75% use IE because it can see the web correctly and fix common HTML / Javascript errors on web pages so that they display properly.
Quote:
Dunno...you say it was working and now isn't? Very strange.Quote:
I dunno on that.. I don't use Mozilla.. IE has all the Mozilla plug in built in by default.. and since it was built for web browsing and all web languages and 99.9% of web page formats, IE is the best for me.. everything else is trying to match it in functionality and failing... IE has Netscape plug-ins, Mozilla Plug-ins, Opera uses the IE plug in's but is still not fully functional with the web the way IE is...
Riight...come on, IE is the ONLY browser on the planet that does not support 8-bit PNG (I believe that was the format)...it doesn't follow the XML codes properly, and allows web designers to be sloppy (auto correcting the code to what it thinks should look right).
The result? A web designer can be incredibly and extremely sloppy, and it looks fine in IE, and terrible in anything that ACTUALLY FOLLOWS THE STANDARDS.Quote:
Plus IE is designed for Windows and is an integral part of Windows, Outlook Express and Windows / MSN messenger
Which means that there are holes in IE that allow a hacker to tear right into your entire system. Watch TechTV sometime, they usually recommend to new users to immediately dump the Microsoft products and get Mozilla immediately as IE is filled with holes and is vulnerable to all sorts of spyware.Quote:
... Why mess with something that is not specifically designed for your system and is an integral part of your system???
1) The Win32 version of Mozilla IS specifically designed for Windows...
2) Internet Explorer is NOT an integral part of your system. Microsoft just tries to make it look integrated, but a couple of college students were actually able to uninstall Internet Explorer from Windows (by hacking it, since Microsoft tried to make it impossible and claimed in court that they wouldn't take it out), with absolutely no problem. The problem actually is CAUSED by IE being integrated into windows- that means that if something screws up IE, then the whole computer can get screwed up from it.Quote:
Now those on Linux.. most people I know on linux use Opera or IE.. and of those people over 75% use IE because it can see the web correctly and fix common HTML / Javascript errors on web pages so that they display properly.
Okay, two things. Firstly, Internet Explorer will display HTML and Java errors as if they were written correctly, which is NOT helpful, but rather encourages programmers to get sloppy since they think it works fine.
Secondly, you apparently don't know many people who use Linux. How the heck will Linux users use Internet Explorer? It's not like Microsoft makes an IE for Linux, you know.
Since you say that 75% of Linux users use IE, one can only assume you really don't know what you're talking about![]()
EDIT: Post Number 2000! Whooo!
<html>
<head></head>
<body bgColor="blue">
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:absolute; left:140px; height:400; width:400;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='image.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
</body>
</html>
<SCRIPT>
var bToggle = 1
<!-- Toggle the sizingMethod property to resize the image. -->
function fnToggle(oObj) {
if (bToggle) {
bToggle = 0;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="image";
oObj.innerText='Enlarge It';}
else {
bToggle = 1;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="scale";
oObj.innerText='Make Normal';}
}
</SCRIPT>
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:relative; height:250px; width:250px;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='/workshop/graphics/earglobe.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
<BR><BUTTON onclick="fnToggle(this);">Make Normal</BUTTON>
Quote:
Just how long have you been out of the loop????
Instructions for installing IE 6.0 on Linux under WinE
http://frankscorner.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=49&page=1
So I don't know what I am talking about eh?
Quote:
heck even on the Linux boards.. many people are asking how to install IE 6.0 on their systems and 90% of the sources refer to the site listed above for installation..
Quote:
Man, i do a lot of research and keep up on tech.. yes IE has holes, but when they are found, they are plugged, and just by changing the security and privacy settings just a little in IE Properties, you close 90% of the holes.. but that requires a little more research on the what to change.. i can post you a guide if you like
Quote:
... and because web developers are sloppy.. or those that are teaching themselves, IE is a wonderful tool for them to use as it will at least build their confidence enough to keep going by giving them visual results... Not everyone can afford $500 to $10,000 for a web site to be built for them.. IE is a fantastic tool to learning web design.. then as they learn more, they can make their pages cross browser compatible...
Quote:
as for PNG and your mighty Proper Coding Techniques... why then don't they follow proper PNG instruction sets for IE?
Quote:
as such here is PNG Code support for the source code for html 4.4 for web designers who want PNG to show in IE.. plus PNG is on the books for native support in IE for the next release...
basic Example :
Code:
<html>
<head></head>
<body bgColor="blue">
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:absolute; left:140px; height:400; width:400;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='image.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
</body>
</html>
or this Functional code set :
Code:<SCRIPT>
var bToggle = 1
<!-- Toggle the sizingMethod property to resize the image. -->
function fnToggle(oObj) {
if (bToggle) {
bToggle = 0;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="image";
oObj.innerText='Enlarge It';}
else {
bToggle = 1;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="scale";
oObj.innerText='Make Normal';}
}
</SCRIPT>
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:relative; height:250px; width:250px;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='/workshop/graphics/earglobe.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
<BR><BUTTON onclick="fnToggle(this);">Make Normal</BUTTON>
Reference :
http://www.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/filter/reference/filters/alphaimageloader.asp
and also if people used proper coding of XML :
http://theultralist.com/xml/
Sooo.. what is your other problems with IE?
Quote:
GEEKFIGHT.
Quote:Quote:
GEEKFIGHT.
Please, be polite!
I perfer the term NERDj/k, hehe
Quote:
OK.. Just as a trial, I got Mozilla Firefox...
I tried it on 10 different web sites.. after having to get 8 different plug-ins (IE I only had to upgrade 2 plug ins for these sites, but the sites work without them.), I quickly uninstalled Mozilla.. reason..
the thing is fricking slow.. it is slower than molassas in winter in Alaska. My god, how can anyone enjoy waiting for pages to load... imagine how it must be on dial-up... IE on dial-up takes no more than 45 seconds on my sisters web site to load in IE on 56K.. I waited over 2 and 1/2 min with Firefox with the same connection and speed....
Quote:
If that is someone's idea of having a better browser, then count me out.. when i click on a page, I want it to pop up and be fully viewable, not slowly load the images on the page...
Quote:
To me IE diaplayed the gage more vibrantly, better organized, faster....
Quote:
besides that people state security.. I have yet to be hacked through IE.. I have yet to get a virus, I have been hit 1 time and 1 time only by a hijack software and even that was fixed in a mere matter of minuites.... plus Hijackers are blocked from my system now with my current settings and tracking cookies are blocked.. IE blocks pop-ups on my end..
Quote:
and I don't use a firewall, router, etc.. I run 99.9% of the time on wireless or on Cable through USB 2.0, which negates the built in router.. I click on a link and pop.. the page is loaded in under 8 seconds when comiming from sites with big pipes...
Taldren's site just pops up fully loaded for the forums both on Dial-up and Cable.. the only thing that is loading when i am reading on dial-up is the signature images.. and even then they are fully loaded within 30 seconds..
Quote:
Mozilla can't even compare in speed, plus it looks and feels less functional than IE.. how many plug-ins do you need to get that thing working correctly for all sites anyways? and what sort of connection accelerator do you need for it to be feasable for use on Dial-up?
Quote:
No wonder when i ask someone if they can see a site or find something on a site and they are not using IE, they tell me that the page is still loading...
Quote:
Also, it needs an easy to configure security settings controller.. with IE, you just right click the IE desktop icon and click properties. you have security right there.
I looked and looked for Mozilla's and couldn't find them. so how do you block Active X controlls, hijackers, cookies?
Quote:
it is slower than molassas in winter in Alaska.
Quote:
besides that people state security.. I have yet to be hacked through IE.. I have yet to get a virus, I have been hit 1 time and 1 time only by a hijack software and even that was fixed in a mere matter of minuites.... plus Hijackers are blocked from my system now with my current settings and tracking cookies are blocked.. IE blocks pop-ups on my end..
and I don't use a firewall, router, etc.. I run 99.9% of the time on wireless or on Cable through USB 2.0, which negates the built in router.. I click on a link and pop.. the page is loaded in under 8 seconds when comiming from sites with big pipes...
Quote:
Mozilla can't even compare in speed, plus it looks and feels less functional than IE.. how many plug-ins do you need to get that thing working correctly for all sites anyways? and what sort of connection accelerator do you need for it to be feasable for use on Dial-up?
I mean IE, you can go to 1 of 1000 sites and do 1 or 2 registry tweaks to turn IE into a speed deamon, but even an untweaked IE browser loads the same page 3 times faster than Mozilla.. I know.. I just tried Stock IE verses Stock Mozilla Firefox side by side timing load times...
then with just a couple of registry tewaks, I pull even more speed out of IE.. *.gif files is the bane of the net, but even those load a lot faster in IE than Mozilla..
Quote:
Mozilla does have a nicer looking interface, but for funtionality and practicality, it has much to be desired...
I would first integrate Macromedia Plug-ins and Shockwave Plug-ins, and Authorware Plugins from Macromedia.. make them and integrated part of Mozilla... that would increase the speed some and reduce the need for getting plug-ins when going to sites with Macromedia material and content...
Quote:
Also, it needs an easy to configure security settings controller.. with IE, you just right click the IE desktop icon and click properties. you have security right there.
I looked and looked for Mozilla's and couldn't find them. so how do you block Active X controlls, hijackers, cookies?
anyhow.. just my opinion.
Quote:
Also extremely strange. Not only should Mozilla be faster or at least equivilant speed, it should DEFINITELY display the text better, at least certain fonts. It supports something (I forget the name, was it text dithering?) that smooths the text and makes it photoshop-realistic. Very sweet.
Quote:
You don't use a firewall or router? I can't even begin to think about how lucky you are. With a dial-up connection I could almost understand it, but not with a Cable/DSL connection. I realize that most attacks are Email based, but IMHO that is still asking for trouble. Do you run an anti-virus program and if so what brand? Do you have any problems viewing certain web sites with the current IE settings that you are talking about. If you have the time could you PM me those settings? I would like the chance to look at them myself.
Quote:Quote:Quote:
GEEKFIGHT.
Please, be polite!
I perfer the term NERDj/k, hehe
My humble apoligies, to any and all Geeks, Nerds, and whom-ever else.
Stephen
Quote:
I dunno on that.. I don't use Mozilla.. IE has all the Mozilla plug in built in by default.. and since it was built for web browsing and all web languages and 99.9% of web page formats, IE is the best for me.. everything else is trying to match it in functionality and failing... IE has Netscape plug-ins, Mozilla Plug-ins, Opera uses the IE plug in's but is still not fully functional with the web the way IE is...
Quote:
Plus IE is designed for Windows and is an integral part of Windows, Outlook Express and Windows / MSN messenger
Quote:
... Why mess with something that is not specifically designed for your system and is an integral part of your system???
Quote:
Now those on Linux.. most people I know on linux use Opera or IE.. and of those people over 75% use IE because it can see the web correctly and fix common HTML / Javascript errors on web pages so that they display properly.
Quote:
Dunno...you say it was working and now isn't? Very strange.Quote:
I dunno on that.. I don't use Mozilla.. IE has all the Mozilla plug in built in by default.. and since it was built for web browsing and all web languages and 99.9% of web page formats, IE is the best for me.. everything else is trying to match it in functionality and failing... IE has Netscape plug-ins, Mozilla Plug-ins, Opera uses the IE plug in's but is still not fully functional with the web the way IE is...
Riight...come on, IE is the ONLY browser on the planet that does not support 8-bit PNG (I believe that was the format)...it doesn't follow the XML codes properly, and allows web designers to be sloppy (auto correcting the code to what it thinks should look right).
The result? A web designer can be incredibly and extremely sloppy, and it looks fine in IE, and terrible in anything that ACTUALLY FOLLOWS THE STANDARDS.Quote:
Plus IE is designed for Windows and is an integral part of Windows, Outlook Express and Windows / MSN messenger
Which means that there are holes in IE that allow a hacker to tear right into your entire system. Watch TechTV sometime, they usually recommend to new users to immediately dump the Microsoft products and get Mozilla immediately as IE is filled with holes and is vulnerable to all sorts of spyware.Quote:
... Why mess with something that is not specifically designed for your system and is an integral part of your system???
1) The Win32 version of Mozilla IS specifically designed for Windows...
2) Internet Explorer is NOT an integral part of your system. Microsoft just tries to make it look integrated, but a couple of college students were actually able to uninstall Internet Explorer from Windows (by hacking it, since Microsoft tried to make it impossible and claimed in court that they wouldn't take it out), with absolutely no problem. The problem actually is CAUSED by IE being integrated into windows- that means that if something screws up IE, then the whole computer can get screwed up from it.Quote:
Now those on Linux.. most people I know on linux use Opera or IE.. and of those people over 75% use IE because it can see the web correctly and fix common HTML / Javascript errors on web pages so that they display properly.
Okay, two things. Firstly, Internet Explorer will display HTML and Java errors as if they were written correctly, which is NOT helpful, but rather encourages programmers to get sloppy since they think it works fine.
Secondly, you apparently don't know many people who use Linux. How the heck will Linux users use Internet Explorer? It's not like Microsoft makes an IE for Linux, you know.
Since you say that 75% of Linux users use IE, one can only assume you really don't know what you're talking about![]()
EDIT: Post Number 2000! Whooo!
<html>
<head></head>
<body bgColor="blue">
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:absolute; left:140px; height:400; width:400;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='image.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
</body>
</html>
<SCRIPT>
var bToggle = 1
<!-- Toggle the sizingMethod property to resize the image. -->
function fnToggle(oObj) {
if (bToggle) {
bToggle = 0;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="image";
oObj.innerText='Enlarge It';}
else {
bToggle = 1;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="scale";
oObj.innerText='Make Normal';}
}
</SCRIPT>
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:relative; height:250px; width:250px;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='/workshop/graphics/earglobe.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
<BR><BUTTON onclick="fnToggle(this);">Make Normal</BUTTON>
Quote:
Just how long have you been out of the loop????
Instructions for installing IE 6.0 on Linux under WinE
http://frankscorner.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=49&page=1
So I don't know what I am talking about eh?
Quote:
heck even on the Linux boards.. many people are asking how to install IE 6.0 on their systems and 90% of the sources refer to the site listed above for installation..
Quote:
Man, i do a lot of research and keep up on tech.. yes IE has holes, but when they are found, they are plugged, and just by changing the security and privacy settings just a little in IE Properties, you close 90% of the holes.. but that requires a little more research on the what to change.. i can post you a guide if you like
Quote:
... and because web developers are sloppy.. or those that are teaching themselves, IE is a wonderful tool for them to use as it will at least build their confidence enough to keep going by giving them visual results... Not everyone can afford $500 to $10,000 for a web site to be built for them.. IE is a fantastic tool to learning web design.. then as they learn more, they can make their pages cross browser compatible...
Quote:
as for PNG and your mighty Proper Coding Techniques... why then don't they follow proper PNG instruction sets for IE?
Quote:
as such here is PNG Code support for the source code for html 4.4 for web designers who want PNG to show in IE.. plus PNG is on the books for native support in IE for the next release...
basic Example :
Code:
<html>
<head></head>
<body bgColor="blue">
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:absolute; left:140px; height:400; width:400;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='image.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
</body>
</html>
or this Functional code set :
Code:<SCRIPT>
var bToggle = 1
<!-- Toggle the sizingMethod property to resize the image. -->
function fnToggle(oObj) {
if (bToggle) {
bToggle = 0;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="image";
oObj.innerText='Enlarge It';}
else {
bToggle = 1;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="scale";
oObj.innerText='Make Normal';}
}
</SCRIPT>
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:relative; height:250px; width:250px;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='/workshop/graphics/earglobe.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
<BR><BUTTON onclick="fnToggle(this);">Make Normal</BUTTON>
Reference :
http://www.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/filter/reference/filters/alphaimageloader.asp
and also if people used proper coding of XML :
http://theultralist.com/xml/
Sooo.. what is your other problems with IE?
Quote:
GEEKFIGHT.
Quote:Quote:
GEEKFIGHT.
Please, be polite!
I perfer the term NERDj/k, hehe
Quote:
OK.. Just as a trial, I got Mozilla Firefox...
I tried it on 10 different web sites.. after having to get 8 different plug-ins (IE I only had to upgrade 2 plug ins for these sites, but the sites work without them.), I quickly uninstalled Mozilla.. reason..
the thing is fricking slow.. it is slower than molassas in winter in Alaska. My god, how can anyone enjoy waiting for pages to load... imagine how it must be on dial-up... IE on dial-up takes no more than 45 seconds on my sisters web site to load in IE on 56K.. I waited over 2 and 1/2 min with Firefox with the same connection and speed....
Quote:
If that is someone's idea of having a better browser, then count me out.. when i click on a page, I want it to pop up and be fully viewable, not slowly load the images on the page...
Quote:
To me IE diaplayed the gage more vibrantly, better organized, faster....
Quote:
besides that people state security.. I have yet to be hacked through IE.. I have yet to get a virus, I have been hit 1 time and 1 time only by a hijack software and even that was fixed in a mere matter of minuites.... plus Hijackers are blocked from my system now with my current settings and tracking cookies are blocked.. IE blocks pop-ups on my end..
Quote:
and I don't use a firewall, router, etc.. I run 99.9% of the time on wireless or on Cable through USB 2.0, which negates the built in router.. I click on a link and pop.. the page is loaded in under 8 seconds when comiming from sites with big pipes...
Taldren's site just pops up fully loaded for the forums both on Dial-up and Cable.. the only thing that is loading when i am reading on dial-up is the signature images.. and even then they are fully loaded within 30 seconds..
Quote:
Mozilla can't even compare in speed, plus it looks and feels less functional than IE.. how many plug-ins do you need to get that thing working correctly for all sites anyways? and what sort of connection accelerator do you need for it to be feasable for use on Dial-up?
Quote:
No wonder when i ask someone if they can see a site or find something on a site and they are not using IE, they tell me that the page is still loading...
Quote:
Also, it needs an easy to configure security settings controller.. with IE, you just right click the IE desktop icon and click properties. you have security right there.
I looked and looked for Mozilla's and couldn't find them. so how do you block Active X controlls, hijackers, cookies?
Quote:
it is slower than molassas in winter in Alaska.
Quote:
besides that people state security.. I have yet to be hacked through IE.. I have yet to get a virus, I have been hit 1 time and 1 time only by a hijack software and even that was fixed in a mere matter of minuites.... plus Hijackers are blocked from my system now with my current settings and tracking cookies are blocked.. IE blocks pop-ups on my end..
and I don't use a firewall, router, etc.. I run 99.9% of the time on wireless or on Cable through USB 2.0, which negates the built in router.. I click on a link and pop.. the page is loaded in under 8 seconds when comiming from sites with big pipes...
Quote:
Mozilla can't even compare in speed, plus it looks and feels less functional than IE.. how many plug-ins do you need to get that thing working correctly for all sites anyways? and what sort of connection accelerator do you need for it to be feasable for use on Dial-up?
I mean IE, you can go to 1 of 1000 sites and do 1 or 2 registry tweaks to turn IE into a speed deamon, but even an untweaked IE browser loads the same page 3 times faster than Mozilla.. I know.. I just tried Stock IE verses Stock Mozilla Firefox side by side timing load times...
then with just a couple of registry tewaks, I pull even more speed out of IE.. *.gif files is the bane of the net, but even those load a lot faster in IE than Mozilla..
Quote:
Mozilla does have a nicer looking interface, but for funtionality and practicality, it has much to be desired...
I would first integrate Macromedia Plug-ins and Shockwave Plug-ins, and Authorware Plugins from Macromedia.. make them and integrated part of Mozilla... that would increase the speed some and reduce the need for getting plug-ins when going to sites with Macromedia material and content...
Quote:
Also, it needs an easy to configure security settings controller.. with IE, you just right click the IE desktop icon and click properties. you have security right there.
I looked and looked for Mozilla's and couldn't find them. so how do you block Active X controlls, hijackers, cookies?
anyhow.. just my opinion.
Quote:
Also extremely strange. Not only should Mozilla be faster or at least equivilant speed, it should DEFINITELY display the text better, at least certain fonts. It supports something (I forget the name, was it text dithering?) that smooths the text and makes it photoshop-realistic. Very sweet.
Quote:
You don't use a firewall or router? I can't even begin to think about how lucky you are. With a dial-up connection I could almost understand it, but not with a Cable/DSL connection. I realize that most attacks are Email based, but IMHO that is still asking for trouble. Do you run an anti-virus program and if so what brand? Do you have any problems viewing certain web sites with the current IE settings that you are talking about. If you have the time could you PM me those settings? I would like the chance to look at them myself.
Quote:Quote:Quote:
GEEKFIGHT.
Please, be polite!
I perfer the term NERDj/k, hehe
My humble apoligies, to any and all Geeks, Nerds, and whom-ever else.
Stephen
Quote:
I dunno on that.. I don't use Mozilla.. IE has all the Mozilla plug in built in by default.. and since it was built for web browsing and all web languages and 99.9% of web page formats, IE is the best for me.. everything else is trying to match it in functionality and failing... IE has Netscape plug-ins, Mozilla Plug-ins, Opera uses the IE plug in's but is still not fully functional with the web the way IE is...
Quote:
Plus IE is designed for Windows and is an integral part of Windows, Outlook Express and Windows / MSN messenger
Quote:
... Why mess with something that is not specifically designed for your system and is an integral part of your system???
Quote:
Now those on Linux.. most people I know on linux use Opera or IE.. and of those people over 75% use IE because it can see the web correctly and fix common HTML / Javascript errors on web pages so that they display properly.
Quote:
Dunno...you say it was working and now isn't? Very strange.Quote:
I dunno on that.. I don't use Mozilla.. IE has all the Mozilla plug in built in by default.. and since it was built for web browsing and all web languages and 99.9% of web page formats, IE is the best for me.. everything else is trying to match it in functionality and failing... IE has Netscape plug-ins, Mozilla Plug-ins, Opera uses the IE plug in's but is still not fully functional with the web the way IE is...
Riight...come on, IE is the ONLY browser on the planet that does not support 8-bit PNG (I believe that was the format)...it doesn't follow the XML codes properly, and allows web designers to be sloppy (auto correcting the code to what it thinks should look right).
The result? A web designer can be incredibly and extremely sloppy, and it looks fine in IE, and terrible in anything that ACTUALLY FOLLOWS THE STANDARDS.Quote:
Plus IE is designed for Windows and is an integral part of Windows, Outlook Express and Windows / MSN messenger
Which means that there are holes in IE that allow a hacker to tear right into your entire system. Watch TechTV sometime, they usually recommend to new users to immediately dump the Microsoft products and get Mozilla immediately as IE is filled with holes and is vulnerable to all sorts of spyware.Quote:
... Why mess with something that is not specifically designed for your system and is an integral part of your system???
1) The Win32 version of Mozilla IS specifically designed for Windows...
2) Internet Explorer is NOT an integral part of your system. Microsoft just tries to make it look integrated, but a couple of college students were actually able to uninstall Internet Explorer from Windows (by hacking it, since Microsoft tried to make it impossible and claimed in court that they wouldn't take it out), with absolutely no problem. The problem actually is CAUSED by IE being integrated into windows- that means that if something screws up IE, then the whole computer can get screwed up from it.Quote:
Now those on Linux.. most people I know on linux use Opera or IE.. and of those people over 75% use IE because it can see the web correctly and fix common HTML / Javascript errors on web pages so that they display properly.
Okay, two things. Firstly, Internet Explorer will display HTML and Java errors as if they were written correctly, which is NOT helpful, but rather encourages programmers to get sloppy since they think it works fine.
Secondly, you apparently don't know many people who use Linux. How the heck will Linux users use Internet Explorer? It's not like Microsoft makes an IE for Linux, you know.
Since you say that 75% of Linux users use IE, one can only assume you really don't know what you're talking about![]()
EDIT: Post Number 2000! Whooo!
<html>
<head></head>
<body bgColor="blue">
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:absolute; left:140px; height:400; width:400;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='image.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
</body>
</html>
<SCRIPT>
var bToggle = 1
<!-- Toggle the sizingMethod property to resize the image. -->
function fnToggle(oObj) {
if (bToggle) {
bToggle = 0;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="image";
oObj.innerText='Enlarge It';}
else {
bToggle = 1;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="scale";
oObj.innerText='Make Normal';}
}
</SCRIPT>
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:relative; height:250px; width:250px;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='/workshop/graphics/earglobe.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
<BR><BUTTON onclick="fnToggle(this);">Make Normal</BUTTON>
Quote:
Just how long have you been out of the loop????
Instructions for installing IE 6.0 on Linux under WinE
http://frankscorner.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=49&page=1
So I don't know what I am talking about eh?
Quote:
heck even on the Linux boards.. many people are asking how to install IE 6.0 on their systems and 90% of the sources refer to the site listed above for installation..
Quote:
Man, i do a lot of research and keep up on tech.. yes IE has holes, but when they are found, they are plugged, and just by changing the security and privacy settings just a little in IE Properties, you close 90% of the holes.. but that requires a little more research on the what to change.. i can post you a guide if you like
Quote:
... and because web developers are sloppy.. or those that are teaching themselves, IE is a wonderful tool for them to use as it will at least build their confidence enough to keep going by giving them visual results... Not everyone can afford $500 to $10,000 for a web site to be built for them.. IE is a fantastic tool to learning web design.. then as they learn more, they can make their pages cross browser compatible...
Quote:
as for PNG and your mighty Proper Coding Techniques... why then don't they follow proper PNG instruction sets for IE?
Quote:
as such here is PNG Code support for the source code for html 4.4 for web designers who want PNG to show in IE.. plus PNG is on the books for native support in IE for the next release...
basic Example :
Code:
<html>
<head></head>
<body bgColor="blue">
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:absolute; left:140px; height:400; width:400;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='image.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
</body>
</html>
or this Functional code set :
Code:<SCRIPT>
var bToggle = 1
<!-- Toggle the sizingMethod property to resize the image. -->
function fnToggle(oObj) {
if (bToggle) {
bToggle = 0;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="image";
oObj.innerText='Enlarge It';}
else {
bToggle = 1;
oDiv.filters(0).sizingMethod="scale";
oObj.innerText='Make Normal';}
}
</SCRIPT>
<!-- This DIV is the target container for the image. -->
<DIV ID="oDiv" STYLE="position:relative; height:250px; width:250px;
filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(
src='/workshop/graphics/earglobe.png', sizingMethod='scale');" >
</DIV>
<BR><BUTTON onclick="fnToggle(this);">Make Normal</BUTTON>
Reference :
http://www.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/filter/reference/filters/alphaimageloader.asp
and also if people used proper coding of XML :
http://theultralist.com/xml/
Sooo.. what is your other problems with IE?
Quote:
GEEKFIGHT.
Quote:Quote:
GEEKFIGHT.
Please, be polite!
I perfer the term NERDj/k, hehe
Quote:
OK.. Just as a trial, I got Mozilla Firefox...
I tried it on 10 different web sites.. after having to get 8 different plug-ins (IE I only had to upgrade 2 plug ins for these sites, but the sites work without them.), I quickly uninstalled Mozilla.. reason..
the thing is fricking slow.. it is slower than molassas in winter in Alaska. My god, how can anyone enjoy waiting for pages to load... imagine how it must be on dial-up... IE on dial-up takes no more than 45 seconds on my sisters web site to load in IE on 56K.. I waited over 2 and 1/2 min with Firefox with the same connection and speed....
Quote:
If that is someone's idea of having a better browser, then count me out.. when i click on a page, I want it to pop up and be fully viewable, not slowly load the images on the page...
Quote:
To me IE diaplayed the gage more vibrantly, better organized, faster....
Quote:
besides that people state security.. I have yet to be hacked through IE.. I have yet to get a virus, I have been hit 1 time and 1 time only by a hijack software and even that was fixed in a mere matter of minuites.... plus Hijackers are blocked from my system now with my current settings and tracking cookies are blocked.. IE blocks pop-ups on my end..
Quote:
and I don't use a firewall, router, etc.. I run 99.9% of the time on wireless or on Cable through USB 2.0, which negates the built in router.. I click on a link and pop.. the page is loaded in under 8 seconds when comiming from sites with big pipes...
Taldren's site just pops up fully loaded for the forums both on Dial-up and Cable.. the only thing that is loading when i am reading on dial-up is the signature images.. and even then they are fully loaded within 30 seconds..
Quote:
Mozilla can't even compare in speed, plus it looks and feels less functional than IE.. how many plug-ins do you need to get that thing working correctly for all sites anyways? and what sort of connection accelerator do you need for it to be feasable for use on Dial-up?
Quote:
No wonder when i ask someone if they can see a site or find something on a site and they are not using IE, they tell me that the page is still loading...
Quote:
Also, it needs an easy to configure security settings controller.. with IE, you just right click the IE desktop icon and click properties. you have security right there.
I looked and looked for Mozilla's and couldn't find them. so how do you block Active X controlls, hijackers, cookies?
Quote:
it is slower than molassas in winter in Alaska.
Quote:
besides that people state security.. I have yet to be hacked through IE.. I have yet to get a virus, I have been hit 1 time and 1 time only by a hijack software and even that was fixed in a mere matter of minuites.... plus Hijackers are blocked from my system now with my current settings and tracking cookies are blocked.. IE blocks pop-ups on my end..
and I don't use a firewall, router, etc.. I run 99.9% of the time on wireless or on Cable through USB 2.0, which negates the built in router.. I click on a link and pop.. the page is loaded in under 8 seconds when comiming from sites with big pipes...
Quote:
Mozilla can't even compare in speed, plus it looks and feels less functional than IE.. how many plug-ins do you need to get that thing working correctly for all sites anyways? and what sort of connection accelerator do you need for it to be feasable for use on Dial-up?
I mean IE, you can go to 1 of 1000 sites and do 1 or 2 registry tweaks to turn IE into a speed deamon, but even an untweaked IE browser loads the same page 3 times faster than Mozilla.. I know.. I just tried Stock IE verses Stock Mozilla Firefox side by side timing load times...
then with just a couple of registry tewaks, I pull even more speed out of IE.. *.gif files is the bane of the net, but even those load a lot faster in IE than Mozilla..
Quote:
Mozilla does have a nicer looking interface, but for funtionality and practicality, it has much to be desired...
I would first integrate Macromedia Plug-ins and Shockwave Plug-ins, and Authorware Plugins from Macromedia.. make them and integrated part of Mozilla... that would increase the speed some and reduce the need for getting plug-ins when going to sites with Macromedia material and content...
Quote:
Also, it needs an easy to configure security settings controller.. with IE, you just right click the IE desktop icon and click properties. you have security right there.
I looked and looked for Mozilla's and couldn't find them. so how do you block Active X controlls, hijackers, cookies?
anyhow.. just my opinion.
Quote:
Also extremely strange. Not only should Mozilla be faster or at least equivilant speed, it should DEFINITELY display the text better, at least certain fonts. It supports something (I forget the name, was it text dithering?) that smooths the text and makes it photoshop-realistic. Very sweet.
Quote:
You don't use a firewall or router? I can't even begin to think about how lucky you are. With a dial-up connection I could almost understand it, but not with a Cable/DSL connection. I realize that most attacks are Email based, but IMHO that is still asking for trouble. Do you run an anti-virus program and if so what brand? Do you have any problems viewing certain web sites with the current IE settings that you are talking about. If you have the time could you PM me those settings? I would like the chance to look at them myself.
Quote:Quote:Quote:
GEEKFIGHT.
Please, be polite!
I perfer the term NERDj/k, hehe
My humble apoligies, to any and all Geeks, Nerds, and whom-ever else.
Stephen